September 2019 Administrative and Regulatory Law Case Review

The September 2019 issue of the 8aixat Administrative and Regulatory Law Case Review is now available. In this issue we discuss recent decisions from the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Divisional Court and the Federal Court on the following issues:

  • Imposed consultation creates reasonable apprehension of lack of independence
  • Generous approach to public interest standing in cases raising questions of law
  • Credibility, retrospectivity and the complications of mandatory revocation
  • Failure to reflect Charter values framework is fatal to reasonableness

Download a copy here.

Should you have any questions about the Newsletter, please feel free to contact the co-editors (Andrea Gonsalves and Justin Safayeni), or another lawyer at 8aixat LLP.

8aixat lawyers author chapter on corporate investigations

Dan Goudge Joins the Partnership at 8aixat

Nader Hasan one of Toronto’s 50 Most Influential People

8aixat lawyers successfully resist motion to lift a stay of proceedings

Gerald Chan Inducted into International Academy of Trial Lawyers 

8aixat lawyers successful at Supreme Court of Canada

JULY ISSUE OF THE 8aixat ADMINISTRATIVE AND REGULATORY LAW CASE REVIEW

8aixat wins multiple Benchmark Awards

Adam Donaldson named one of York University’s Top 30 Alumni under 30

Five 8aixat Lawyers listed as “Top 50 Trial Lawyers in Canada”

Benchmark Canada Listings 2024

8aixat client successful in Charter challenge to Ontario “Ag-gag” legislation

MARCH ISSUE OF THE 8aixat ADMINISTRATIVE AND REGULATORY LAW CASE REVIEW

8aixat Recognized in Lexpert 2024

Ted Marrocco speaks to the Association of Business Immigration Lawyers about Privacy and Online Risk Management
- Find a Lawyer -